Difference between revisions of "De sanctis"

From Theatrum Paracelsicum
(Created page with "<b>Printing History, Manuscripts</b>. Not printed before Gantenbein. Two manuscripts. <b>Editions</b>. Edited by Gantenbein in <i>Neue Paracelsus-Edition</i> 1: 541–545, 843–845 <b>Relationship between different versions</b>. Only one version known. <b>Structure, genre/form, perspective, style</b>. <b>Relationship to other texts</b>. In both manuscripts, <i>De sanctis</i> is – together with an explication of psalms 149 and 150, otherwise unknown – appended to...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<b>Printing History, Manuscripts</b>. Not printed before Gantenbein. Two manuscripts.
{{Heading|level=3|align=left|before=1|family=serif|bold=0|text=I. Basic information}}


<b>Editions</b>. Edited by Gantenbein in <i>Neue Paracelsus-Edition</i> 1: 541–545, 843–845
<b>Printing History, Manuscripts.</b> Not printed before Gantenbein. Two manuscripts.


<b>Relationship between different versions</b>. Only one version known.
<b>Editions.</b> Edited by Gantenbein in <i>Neue Paracelsus-Edition</i> 1: 541–545, 843–845


<b>Structure, genre/form, perspective, style</b>.
<b>Relationship between different versions.</b> Only one version known.


<b>Relationship to other texts</b>. In both manuscripts, <i>De sanctis</i> is – together with an explication of psalms 149 and 150, otherwise unknown – appended to the authentic <i>De venerandis sanctis</i>.
<b>Structure, genre/form, perspective, style.</b>


<b>Authenticity, authorship</b>. According to Gantenbein “doubts must be raised as to its authenticity since the uncritical and affirmative approach to the veneration of the saints is rather untypical for Paracelsus.” Otherwise <i>De sanctis</i> may only be one of the early theological writings of Paracelsus.
<b>Relationship to other texts.</b> In both manuscripts, <i>De sanctis</i> is – together with an explication of psalms 149 and 150, otherwise unknown – appended to the authentic <i>De venerandis sanctis</i>.


<b>Time of writing</b>. Further study required.
<b>Authenticity, authorship.</b> According to Gantenbein “doubts must be raised as to its authenticity since the uncritical and affirmative approach to the veneration of the saints is rather untypical for Paracelsus.” Otherwise <i>De sanctis</i> may only be one of the early theological writings of Paracelsus.
 
<b>Time of writing.</b> Further study required.
 
{{Heading|level=3|align=left|before=1|family=serif|bold=0|text=II. Sources}}


<b>Manuscripts:</b>
<b>Manuscripts:</b>
Line 18: Line 22:


<b>First printed:</b> not printed before Gantenbein (2008)
<b>First printed:</b> not printed before Gantenbein (2008)
{{Heading|level=3|align=left|before=1|family=serif|bold=0|text=III. Bibliography}}
<b>Essential bibliography:</b> Sudhoff, <i>Paracelsus-Handschriften</i>, 387.

Latest revision as of 16:32, 2 July 2022

I. Basic information


Printing History, Manuscripts. Not printed before Gantenbein. Two manuscripts.

Editions. Edited by Gantenbein in Neue Paracelsus-Edition 1: 541–545, 843–845

Relationship between different versions. Only one version known.

Structure, genre/form, perspective, style.

Relationship to other texts. In both manuscripts, De sanctis is – together with an explication of psalms 149 and 150, otherwise unknown – appended to the authentic De venerandis sanctis.

Authenticity, authorship. According to Gantenbein “doubts must be raised as to its authenticity since the uncritical and affirmative approach to the veneration of the saints is rather untypical for Paracelsus.” Otherwise De sanctis may only be one of the early theological writings of Paracelsus.

Time of writing. Further study required.

II. Sources


Manuscripts:

  • Fulda, Hochschul- und Landesbibliothek: Cod. 22a (2), 2°, f. 201v–204r
  • Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek: Voss. Chym. F.24, f. 456v–458v

First printed: not printed before Gantenbein (2008)

III. Bibliography


Essential bibliography: Sudhoff, Paracelsus-Handschriften, 387.