Theophrastia (De archidoxis, Parasarchum, Carboantes)

From Theatrum Paracelsicum
Revision as of 17:09, 25 June 2022 by JP (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<b>Printing History, Manuscripts</b>. Not printed, no manuscripts known. The <i>Theophrastia</i> may or may not have existed at some time. <i>Theophrastia</i> was the title of a “book” (<i>librum</i>) mentioned by Valentius de Retiis (in a text of uncertain dating, first published in 1562). It consisted of three works: <i>De archidoxis</i> (§ ‎3.4), <i>Parasarchum</i> (§ ‎1.20), and <i>Carboantes</i> (§ ‎4.22). <b>Editions</b>. Not edited by Huser or Sudhof...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Printing History, Manuscripts. Not printed, no manuscripts known. The Theophrastia may or may not have existed at some time. Theophrastia was the title of a “book” (librum) mentioned by Valentius de Retiis (in a text of uncertain dating, first published in 1562). It consisted of three works: De archidoxis (§ ‎3.4), Parasarchum (§ ‎1.20), and Carboantes (§ ‎4.22).

Editions. Not edited by Huser or Sudhoff.

Relationship between different versions. It is not certain if the book existed at all.

Structure, genre/form, perspective, style. A “book” consisting of three “works.”

Relationship to other texts. See De archidoxis (§ ‎3.4).

Authenticity, authorship. Gerhard Dorn and Michael Toxites both believed in the existence of Theophrastia, Sudhoff denotes it as “more than legendary,” Gilly doubts its existence while Kühlmann and Telle reject any such doubts as “unjustified.”

Time of writing. Further study required.

Manuscripts: no manuscripts known

First printed: not printed