Search results

...um hinzustellen. Aber anders ist es hier kaum möglich. Auch ich war früher in den gewöhnlichen irrigen Vorstellungen über diesen Mann befangen, und ers ...von den Menschen, welche, mit ungewöhnlicher Tüchtigkeit und Kraft begabt, in eine gährende Zeit geworfen, zu Repräsentanten von Parteien gewählt werd

...hrastus Paracelsus, qui in Chymia Praeceptores egregios nactus, ut ipse, ''in secunda parte Chirurgiae magnae, tracat. 1. c. 1.'' refert, & institutus no ...udire volunt, Petrum Severinum, qui dogmata â Paracelso hinc inde disjecta in artis formam redigere conatus est, potiús, quâm ipsum Paracelsum, sequunt

|Subtitle=Alchemy, Angels, and Empire in The Tempest ...ractices: The Relationship Between Religion, Natural Philosophy, and Magic in 16th Century Denmark

<b>Printing History, Manuscripts.</b> The letter is found in a single manuscript volume of authentic theological writings of Paracelsus, ...dhoff or Goldammer. Identified and critically edited by Kühlmann and Telle in CP 3 (2013), 300–322, n° 108.

{{trim|{{:Bibliographia Paracelsica/BP.Fedro.1556-01|In=1}}}} {{trim|{{:Bibliographia Paracelsica/BP.Fedro.1565-01|In=1}}}}

<b>Printing History, Manuscripts.</b> First published by Ps.-Huser in 1603. Four manuscripts (not attributed to Paracelsus, but to Caspar Hartung <b>Editions.</b> Edited by Ps.-Huser in <i>Opera Bücher vnd Schrifften</i> (1603), 2: 686–691. Not edited by Sud

...574). Huser (1590) took his text from yet another manuscript. Gerhard Dorn published a Latin translation as early as 1570. At least seven further manuscripts. <b>Editions.</b> Edited by Huser, 6 (1590): 363–374. Edited by Sudhoff in Paracelsus, <i>Sämtliche Werke</i>, I/14: 391–399.

...prepared by {{CategoryLink|Georg Joachim Rheticus}} (autograph manuscript in Florence). Three manuscripts. <b>Editions.</b> Edited by Huser, 6 (1590): 375–395. Edited by Sudhoff in Paracelsus, <i>Sämtliche Werke</i>, I/14: 405–420.

...ipt, written in Czech. A German translation was published by Georg Sticker in 1941. It is, however, deficient, according to Tschinkel. ...and later. The <i>Colloquium</i> was probably written in the late 1580s or in the 1590s.

...ictitious. Was it also the opinion of Huser, who did not include any of it in his edition? ...“Carboantes de Occultis lib 66. Separatio Vtilis ab inutili. Transmutatio in forma et esse. <Aurum> potabile. Quinta essentia. Lapis Philosophorum et Ma

| In={{{In|}}} | PrinterPlace=Wien