Search results

|Subtitle=Alchemy, Angels, and Empire in The Tempest ...ractices: The Relationship Between Religion, Natural Philosophy, and Magic in 16th Century Denmark

...er's understanding for any errors in the text, which stem from limitations in the original copy used for this publication, not from negligence or careles ...orks on vitriol and sulfur being flawed, this version aims to present them in their entirety as originally intended by the author. The goal is to dissemi

<b>Printing History, Manuscripts.</b> The letter is found in a single manuscript volume of authentic theological writings of Paracelsus, ...dhoff or Goldammer. Identified and critically edited by Kühlmann and Telle in CP 3 (2013), 300–322, n° 108.

...in 1604, and Benedictus Figulus in 1608. – German version B first printed in 1606, edited by Franz Kieser. – Four Latin manuscripts (not ascribed to P ...ent versions.</b> First written in Latin, then translated into German. The Stuttgart <i>Catalogus</i> lists two German manuscripts, but the second only is attri

...eg) manuscript is closely related to the sources used by the early editors in a way that has yet to be determined. The Braunschweig manuscript (owned by ...tions.</b> Edited by Huser, 10 (1590): Appendix, 66–138. Edited by Sudhoff in Paracelsus, <i>Sämtliche Werke</i>, I/14: 437–498.

<b>Printing History, Manuscripts.</b> First published by Ps.-Huser in 1603. No manuscripts known. <b>Editions.</b> Edited by Ps.-Huser in <i>Opera Bücher vnd Schrifften</i>, II, 1603, 682–686. Not edited by Sud

...ictitious. Was it also the opinion of Huser, who did not include any of it in his edition? ...“Carboantes de Occultis lib 66. Separatio Vtilis ab inutili. Transmutatio in forma et esse. <Aurum> potabile. Quinta essentia. Lapis Philosophorum et Ma

<b>Editions.</b> First published by Karl Sudhoff in 1933 in Paracelsus, <i>Sämtliche Werke</i>, I/14: 305–308. ...ences found in the Heidelberg manuscript. However, the order of paragraphs in the Heidelberg manuscript is distorted, making the text completely unintell

...ts.</b> First printed in 1573, not attributed to Paracelsus. Printed again in 1586, now attributed to Paracelsus. ...rgine Geheimnisse Allergeheimnissen</i> and even boasted about being “now, in this year 1586, edited for the first time from the autograph manuscripts of

...an edition by Hartmut Rudolph in 1983 (unpublished draft). First published in 2014 by Nikolaus Czifra. One single manuscript. ...i> and <i>narratio</i>, but is missing <i>datum</i> and <i>subscriptio</i> in the manuscript.

...History, Manuscripts.</b> Not printed. Two manuscripts known, both written in the 18th century. ...n in the perspective of a father or teacher directly addressing the reader in the second person (“du,” “du mein Sohn”).